
Google Ads management
Search, Shopping, Performance Max and Demand Gen as one system that we work on every business day.




















Setup
Microsoft offers an import from Google Ads, and it is a usable starting point. The auction is thinner, search volume is smaller, and automations that depend on data volume in Google often run dry here. A one-to-one clone therefore mainly produces a lot of campaigns with no basis to learn from.
We consolidate after the import: fewer, larger structures, adjusted bid strategies, dedicated exclusion lists and a feed that accounts for the particularities of the Microsoft Merchant Center.

Measurement
Measurement runs through Universal Event Tracking, usually via Tag Manager or server-side, with the same conversion definitions as in Google Ads. That is the actual work: only when both channels count the same conversion and the same value is it valid to compare them at all.
We set this up together with the tracking setup that is the foundation of any management anyway; see Tracking & Analytics.

Prioritisation
Three things lead us there. Volume stays so small even after the learning phase that management turns into noise. Contribution margins stay below those of comparable Google campaigns for good. Or the management effort eats up the additional revenue.
In that case we recommend pausing the channel instead of dragging it along as a line in the report. A clear no is cheaper than a channel nobody defends any more, yet nobody switches off either.
We check it against your product range and your numbers, and we also say no when no is the right answer.


Search, Shopping, Performance Max and Demand Gen as one system that we work on every business day.

Merchant Center, product feed and Shopping campaigns from a single team, with feed management built in.

Build new demand on YouTube, Shorts, Discover and Gmail, and measure its contribution across the rest of the account.

Conversion tracking, Consent Mode v2, server-side and GA4: the foundation to lay before budget scales on top of it.

Structure, search terms, feed, tracking and budget reviewed, ending in a prioritised roadmap.
That depends on your product range and audience, far more than on any general reach figure. Bing comes pre-installed on Windows devices, which in some categories means a noticeably different audience and in others practically none. A limited test answers the question within a few weeks, using your own data.
We give no comparison figure for this, because without your category it is worthless. Auction competition is lower in many industries, but so is volume. What matters is the contribution margin per euro spent, more than the click price, and we measure that in the account.
Technically yes, as a starting point. A one-to-one clone, however, produces many campaigns with no basis to learn from, because volume is smaller. After the import we consolidate into fewer, larger structures, adjust bid strategies and account for the particularities of the Microsoft Merchant Center in the feed.
Very different figures circulate, depending on measurement method and device type, so we do not present any of them as fact. The only reliable answer is category-specific: how much qualified demand in your product areas runs through Bing. That is exactly what a limited test measures.
Through Universal Event Tracking, via Tag Manager or server-side. The tag itself matters less than making sure Microsoft counts the same conversion and the same value as Google Ads. Otherwise you are comparing two numbers that have nothing to do with each other.
A fixed threshold would be made up. The practical trigger is the same as for any additional channel: once extra budget in Google only pushes up the click price, it is worth looking elsewhere. What matters is leaving enough budget for the test to complete a learning phase properly.